Select Keyboard:
Türkçe ▾
  1. Türkçe
  2. English
  3. العربية
  4. Dansk
  5. Deutsch
  6. Ελληνικά
  7. Español
  8. فارسی
  9. Français
  10. Italiano
  11. Kurdî
  12. Nederlands
  13. Polski
  14. Português Brasileiro
  15. Português
  16. Русский
  17. Suomi
  18. Svenska
  19. 中文注音符号
  20. 中文仓颉输入法
X
"1234567890*-Bksp
Tabqwertyuıopğü,
CapsasdfghjklşiEnter
Shift<zxcvbnmöç.Shift
AltGr

tutuklunun ikilemi

listen to the pronunciation of tutuklunun ikilemi
Turkish - English
(Pisikoloji, Ruhbilim) prisoner's dilemma
The prisoner's dilemma is a fundamental problem in game theory that demonstrates why two people might not cooperate even if it is in both their best interests to do so. It was originally framed by Merrill Flood and Melvin Dresher working at RAND in 1950. Albert W. Tucker formalized the game with prison sentence payoffs and gave it the "prisoner's dilemma" name (Poundstone, 1992)
Imaginary situation employed in game theory. One version is as follows. Two prisoners are accused of a crime. If one confesses and the other does not, the one who confesses will be released immediately and the other will spend 20 years in prison. If neither confesses, each will be held only a few months. If both confess, they will each be jailed 15 years. They cannot communicate with one another. Given that neither prisoner knows whether the other has confessed, it is in the self-interest of each to confess himself. Paradoxically, when each prisoner pursues his self-interest, both end up worse off than they would have been had they acted otherwise. See egoism