الإنجليزية - التركية
تعريف peer-review في الإنجليزية التركية القاموس.
- (Ticaret) emsal değerlendirme
- (Ticaret) akran değerlendirmesi
- (Politika, Siyaset) bağımsız değerlendirme
- (Pisikoloji, Ruhbilim) akran incelemesi
- (Ticaret) akran değerlendirmeleri
الإنجليزية - الإنجليزية
تعريف peer-review في الإنجليزية الإنجليزية القاموس.
- A process by which something proposed (as for research or publication) is evaluated by a group of experts in the appropriate field
- Evaluate professionally a colleague's work, (synonym) referee
- The process of evaluating manuscripts submitted by potential contributors by at least one subject specialist in addition to the editor prior to acceptance for publication Journal articles are usually peer-reviewed Internet documents are not usually peer-reviewed
- the process in which scholars or specialists in a field have critically evaluated an article prior to it being accepted for publication Peer-reviewed journals are also sometimes called referreed journals
- process used for scholarly journals which insures quality control
- An organized method for evaluating scientific work which is used by scientists to certify the correctness of procedures
- A written idea, hypothesis, or theory that has been reviewed and accepted by experts as worthy of publication in the professional literature of the experts' field
a paper submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal is examined by other scientists in the field .
- The reviewing before publication, by an authority or authorities in the pertinent field of study, of the written form of an idea, hypothesis, theory, and/or written discussion of such
Three drafts of his report were peer reviewed before it was accepted for publication.
- The scholarly process whereby manuscripts intended to be published in an academic journal are reviewed by independent researchers (referees) to evaluate the contribution, i.e. the importance, novelty and accuracy of the manuscript's contents
Peer review happens in two ways. In one method, a paper submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal is examined by other scientists in the field before an editor (usually an expert in the field) passes judgment on it. The second method is review by an independent panel of experts who, using rigorous criteria, determine whether the findings of the paper are credible.
- The evaluation of quality of total health care provided by medical staff with equivalent training
- – A review by members of the profession "peers" regarding the quality of care provided a patient, including documentation of care (medical audit), diagnostic steps used, conclusions reached, therapy given, appropriateness of utilization (utilization review), and reasonableness of charges
- Review of health care provided by a medical staff with training equal to the staff which provided the treatment (H)
- The term 'peer review' in this project involves the exercise of judgement about the quality of an ICT-based teaching and learning resource by peers who are external to the site and process of the development of that resource The review process is 'blind' - independent and anonymous
- A review of a software work product, following defined procedures, by peers of the producers of the product for the purpose of identifying defects and improvements
- Review of applications for support from the NIH by groups composed of scientists from the extramural research community (as opposed to review by federal/NIH employees)
- A system using reviewers who are the professional equals of the principal investigator or program director who is to be responsible for directing or conducting the proposed project It is a form of objective review Peer review is legislatively mandated in some programs and in other programs is administratively required
- The process by which manuscripts submitted to health, biomedical, and other scientifically oriented journals and other publications are evaluated by experts in appropriate fields (usually anonymous to the authors) to determine if the manuscripts are of adequate quality for publication
- Review of health care provided by a medical staff with training equal to the staff which provided the treatment
- Analysis of research by a group of professionals of comparable knowledge and expertise in a specific scientific or medical field
- evaluate professionally a colleague's work
- A formal review of an item by a group of peers of the item's developer
- Mechanism of ensuring quality of care within the medical community The quality assurance review is conducted by health care professionals (peers) to ensure that care provided and services used are appropriate It is also used to identify fraud and other abuses of health care payment systems
- evaluation of the quality of total health care provided by medical staff with equivalent training
- A review by members of the profession "peers" regarding the quality of care provided a patient, including documentation of care (medical audit), diagnostic steps used, conclusions reached, therapy given, appropriateness of utilization (utilization review), and reasonableness of charges claims
- A system in which the appropriateness of healthcare services delivered by a provider to health plan members is evaluated by a panel of medical professionals
- process in which research articles are reviewed and critiqued by experts in that field before publication
- The procedure by which academic journal articles are reviewed by other researchers before being accepted for publication
- The process used by the scientific community to assess a scientific paper, report, project, or proposal by seeking comments on it from independent assessors ('peers') working in the same field
- The process of reviewing a journal article or conference paper to ensure that it meets the required standards for publication Such a review is performed by respected authorities (or peers) in the field
- A review of a CPA firm's accounting or auditing practice involving procedures tailored to the size of the firm and the nature of its practice For PCPS and SECPS firms, includes a review of the firm's compliance with the applicable section's membership requirements Peer reviews are performed in accordance with standards established the AICPA Peer Review Board for PCPS firms and firms enrolled in the AICPA Peer Review Program, and by the SECPS Peer Review Committee for SECPS member firms
- Written, critical response to a study, data, or report provided by scientists and other technically qualified professionals
- The process scientists use to examine the work of fellow scientists before it is published or accepted within the scientific community
- The evaluation of the quality of the services provided by a plan's clinical staff by equivalently trained clinical personnel
- The analysis of a clinician's care by a group of that clinician's professional colleagues The provider's care is generally compared to applicable standards of care, and the group's analysis is used as a learning tool for the members of the group
- The review of casework for technical correctness by a peer