akran incelemesi

listen to the pronunciation of akran incelemesi
التركية - الإنجليزية
(Pisikoloji, Ruhbilim) peer review
A written idea, hypothesis, or theory that has been reviewed and accepted by experts as worthy of publication in the professional literature of the experts' field

a paper submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal is examined by other scientists in the field .

The reviewing before publication, by an authority or authorities in the pertinent field of study, of the written form of an idea, hypothesis, theory, and/or written discussion of such

Three drafts of his report were peer reviewed before it was accepted for publication.

The evaluation of quality of total health care provided by medical staff with equivalent training
– A review by members of the profession "peers" regarding the quality of care provided a patient, including documentation of care (medical audit), diagnostic steps used, conclusions reached, therapy given, appropriateness of utilization (utilization review), and reasonableness of charges
Review of health care provided by a medical staff with training equal to the staff which provided the treatment (H)
The term 'peer review' in this project involves the exercise of judgement about the quality of an ICT-based teaching and learning resource by peers who are external to the site and process of the development of that resource The review process is 'blind' - independent and anonymous
A review of a software work product, following defined procedures, by peers of the producers of the product for the purpose of identifying defects and improvements
Review of applications for support from the NIH by groups composed of scientists from the extramural research community (as opposed to review by federal/NIH employees)
A system using reviewers who are the professional equals of the principal investigator or program director who is to be responsible for directing or conducting the proposed project It is a form of objective review Peer review is legislatively mandated in some programs and in other programs is administratively required
The process by which manuscripts submitted to health, biomedical, and other scientifically oriented journals and other publications are evaluated by experts in appropriate fields (usually anonymous to the authors) to determine if the manuscripts are of adequate quality for publication
Review of health care provided by a medical staff with training equal to the staff which provided the treatment
Analysis of research by a group of professionals of comparable knowledge and expertise in a specific scientific or medical field
evaluate professionally a colleague's work
A formal review of an item by a group of peers of the item's developer
Mechanism of ensuring quality of care within the medical community The quality assurance review is conducted by health care professionals (peers) to ensure that care provided and services used are appropriate It is also used to identify fraud and other abuses of health care payment systems
evaluation of the quality of total health care provided by medical staff with equivalent training
A review by members of the profession "peers" regarding the quality of care provided a patient, including documentation of care (medical audit), diagnostic steps used, conclusions reached, therapy given, appropriateness of utilization (utilization review), and reasonableness of charges claims
A system in which the appropriateness of healthcare services delivered by a provider to health plan members is evaluated by a panel of medical professionals
process in which research articles are reviewed and critiqued by experts in that field before publication
The procedure by which academic journal articles are reviewed by other researchers before being accepted for publication
akran incelemesi
المفضلات
المزيد...
امسح